Concurrent Chemo-Radiation Results in Equivalent Local and Overall Outcome as Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery for Clinical Stage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Reviewer: William Levin, MD
Last Modified: October 9, 2002
Presenter: N.A. Taylor
Presenter's Affiliation: Department of Radiation Oncology, UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
Type of Session: Scientific
- In this study, investigators looked at 2 different treatment regimens for clinical stage IIIa non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Materials and Methods
- This is a retrospective study.
- 107 patients received either a) induction chemotherapy followed by surgery (C/S), or b) concurrent chemo-irradiation (CRT).
- Patient characteristics were balanced between the two groups. However, mediastinoscopy was not routinely used for staging.
- In the C/S group, induction chemotherapy included 2-4 cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection.
- Post-op RT, which was given to 35 patients, was done at the discretion of the physician
- CRT consisted of 3 cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy given concurrently with RT, which was 60-63 Gy/30-35 fractions in 27 patients, and 69.6 Gy/b.id. fractionation in the remainder of patients.
- Median follow-up was 20 months in all patients and 32 months in surviving patients.
- 5 year overall survival was not statistically significant between the two groups (33% for C/S vs. 30% for CRT).
- Likewise, disease-free survival was not different (24% C/S vs. 23% CRT).
- Local control and rate of distant metastases were also similar.
- Patients who responded to chemotherapy prior surgery had significantly better 5-y OS (50%), versus those who had stable or progressive disease (16%) p=0001.
- Post-operative radiation therapy improved local control but did not affect overall survival.
- Patients with clinical stage IIIa NSCLC have equivalent survival and local control following treatment with either C/S or CRT.
- Post-operative RT significantly improves local control in patients treated with C/S, without improving overall survival.
- This study suggests that there is equivalency between the two treatment regimens for clinical stage IIIa NSCLC.
- However, one must consider that mediastinoscopy was generally not done, so there actually may by a difference in lymph node status between groups. Additionally, radiation technique varied significantly, with some patients getting hyperfractionation.
- In general, it must be remembered that this was a retrospective review and therefore a prospective randomized study would give the strongest support for the authors? conclusions. Unfortunatly, it is very difficult to accrue patients a prospective randomized trial that randomizes between surgery and a non-surgical arm.
Oncolink's ASTRO Coverage made possible by an unrestricted Educational Grant from Ortho Biotech.
Frequently Asked Questions
National Cancer Institute
I Wish You Knew
How cancer patients have changed my life
Blogs and Web Chats
OncoLink Blogs give our readers a chance to react to and comment on key cancer news topics and provides a forum for OncoLink Experts and readers to share opinions and learn from each other.
Facing a new cancer diagnosis or changing the course of your current treatment? Let our cancer nurses help you through!