Randomized Trials and IMRT: Overkill or Overdue?

S. Jack Wei, MD
Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania
Last Modified: October 22, 2003

Share article


Moderator: Theodore L. Phillips, MD., University of California, San Francisco

Soeren M. Bentzen, PhD., DSc., Gray Laboratory Cancer Research Trust, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex, United Kingdom

  • IMRT is an advanced technology for radiation therapy (RT), using non-uniform radiation beam intensities incident upon the patient.
  • From a dosimetric and operational point of view, IMRT is superior to forward-planned treatment, including 3DCRT.
  • Despite, the dosimetric advantages of IMRT, the question remains: Will IMRT improve clinical outcomes?
  • Various schemes for levels of clinical evidence support of a treatment have been proposed; most define level I evidence as large, adequately powered randomized trials or a metaanalysis supporting the use of treatment. Level IV evidence can be defined as single-arm non-randomized trials comparing results to historical controls.
  • Clinical outcome data for IMRT is almost solely level IV evidence.
  • Level IV evidence does not equal Level I evidence.
  • As a historical example, the use of continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiation therapy (CHART) for head and neck (H&N) cancers was studied and compared to historical controls treated with conventionally fractionated RT matched for tumor site, T stage, and N stage. These comparisons showed improved outcome with CHART; however, a randomized trial of CHART showed no difference compared to conventional fractionation.
  • The above example demonstrates the importance of randomized trials.
  • In conclusion, evidence-based IMRT is not showing improved distribution but a therapeutic gain; it is not showing decreased toxicity, but doing so without compromising local control, it is not increasing local control, but doing so without increasing toxicity.


News
Majority of randomized controlled oncology trials assess treatments available outside trials

Nov 2, 2010 - Most recent oncology randomized controlled trials evaluate drugs that are available "off-protocol therapy" in the United States, and this can adversely impact trial enrollment, according to a study published online Oct. 25 in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.



I Wish You Knew

How cancer patients have changed my life

View More



Blogs and Web Chats

OncoLink Blogs give our readers a chance to react to and comment on key cancer news topics and provides a forum for OncoLink Experts and readers to share opinions and learn from each other.




OncoLink OncoPilot

Facing a new cancer diagnosis or changing the course of your current treatment? Let our cancer nurses help you through!

Learn More