RTOG 9704 a phase III study of adjuvant pre and post chemoradiation (CRT) 5-FU vs. gemcitabine (G) for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Reviewer: John P. Plastaras, MD, PhD
Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania
Last Modified: June 6, 2006

Presenter: William F. Regine
Presenter's Affiliation: University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD
Type of Session: Scientific


  • Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, even when resectable, has a poor prognosis.  Failures occur both locoregionally and systemically.
  • Adjuvant treatment of resected pancreas adenocarcinoma is controversial.  Although the ESPAC trial showed that adjuvant chemotherapy alone was superior to chemoradiation, this study has been widely criticized.
  • Chemoradiation (CRT) with 5FU has been a standard treatment in the U.S.
  • Gemcitabine (G) is active in pancreas cancer, and confers a survival benefit in the metastatic setting.
  • RTOG 9704 was designed to determine if the addition of G to postoperative adjuvant 5-FU CRT improved survival for patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Materials and Methods

  • Phase III Design: Intergroup (RTOG, ECOG, SWOG) trial of randomized to:
    • Pre and post CRT 5-FU (continuous infusion at 250 mg/m2/day)
    • Pre and post CRT G (1000 mg/m2 IV weekly)
  • Patients:
    • Patients with pathologic stage T1-4, N0/1, M0 pancreatic adenocarcinoma status post gross total resection. The surgeon on this study reviewed all of the operative notes and pathology reports to confirm gross total resection.
    • 2/3 were node positive
    • Accrued from 7/1998 - 7/2002
    • 538 pts were entered; 442 were eligible and analyzable
    • Major reasons for ineligibility
      • serum not sent for CA-19-9 analysis (n=22)
      • treatment starting > 8 weeks post surgery (n=19)
  • Treatment:
    • Pre CRT treatment was for 3 weeks prior to CRT.
    • Post CRT treatment was for 12 weeks after CRT.
    • CRT was 50.4 Gy 1.8 Gy/fx/day with continuous infusion 5-FU, 250 mg/m2/day during radiation
  • Stratification:
    • Nodal status (uninvolved vs. involved)
    • Primary tumor diameter (< 3 cm vs. > 3cm)
    • Surgical margins (negative vs. positive vs. unknown)
  • Endpoints:
    • Primary: Overall survival.
    • original accrual goal was 330 patients, but rapid accrual allowed an amendment to look specifically at overall survival in pancreatic head tumors


  • Arms were well balanced except for T-stage (T3/4 > for G, p=0.013)
  • Overall survival:
    • G significantly improved survival in pancreatic head tumors (n=380)
    • Median survival: 18.8 months G vs. 16.7 months 5-FU
    • 3-yr survival: 31% G vs. 21% 5-FU
    • HR 0.79 (95% CI 0.63-0.99, p=0.047)
    • No significant difference when body/tail tumors included (n=442) (p=0.2)
  • Toxicity:
    • No significant difference in >Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity
    • Grade 4 hematologic toxicity rate high in G arm
    • 14% G arm vs. 2% 5-FU arm (p<0.0001)
    • No difference in febrile neutropenia/infection.
    • Ability to complete treatment per study was similar:
      • chemo (86%, 5-FU vs. 90%, G) and RT (85%, 5-FU vs. 88%, G)

Author's Conclusions

  • The addition of G to postoperative adjuvant 5-FU CRT significantly improves survival in pts with pancreatic head adenocarcinoma.

Clinical/Scientific Implications

  • Although the optimum adjuvant treatment for resected adenocarcinoma remains controversial, this study explored the best adjuvant chemotherapy to be combined with 5-FU sensitized CRT
  • This study was designed to evaluate adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head as a primary endpoint. In this population there was a clear advantage to G of 5-FU for pre- and post-chemotherapy that sandwiched the CRT
  • The RTOG will adopt Gemzar followed by 5-FU/XRT followed by additional Gemzar as the standard for future clinical trials of adjuvant pancreatic cancer


Is Ayurveda the Answer to Women’s Health Issues?
by The 4Wholeness Team
September 01, 2015