Robotic Laparoscopic Prostatectomy

Last Modified: February 12, 2006

Question

Dear OncoLink "Ask The Experts,"

My husband is 53-years-old and was diagnosed last week with T1c prostate cancer with a Gleason score of 6. Also, I would like to know your opinion of this procedure versus the open surgery. Thank you very much.

Answer

Alan J. Wein, MD, Professor and Chair of the Division of Urology at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, responds:

At this point, the rates of incontinence and impotence with robotic laparoscopic prostatectomy look similar to the gold-standard retropubic procedure. However, this only holds true in the hands of experienced robotic surgeons who have done a number of cases (probably the learning curve requires about 75 procedures). The convalescence is somewhat shorter (2 to 2-1/2 wks or so), and blood loss is less. There are NO long term recurrence rates available because the technique is relatively new. The standard long-term follow-up for prostate canceris at least 10-15 yrs. The bottom line is, pick the surgeon, not the procedure.

Blogs

How to Find the Cancer Resources You Need - Brown Bag Web Chat
by OncoLink Editorial Team
June 15, 2011

Don't Assume You Understand
by Bob Riter
July 29, 2015

Related News

Similar Outcomes for Robotic, Laparoscopic Prostatectomy

Apr 17, 2013

Findings based on urologic, sexual functioning at 36 months of follow-up


Similar Morbidity for Robotic, Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

Feb 1, 2012

But, robotic treatment significantly more costly for treatment of endometrial cancer


Age, Nerve Sparing Tied to Post-Prostatectomy Sexual Function

Feb 17, 2012

Younger age and bilateral nerve sparing surgery improve orgasmic outcomes after RALP