IMRT vs Traditional Radiation
Is there a benefit with IMRT versus traditional radiation therapy for head and neck cancer patients? I have met with 2 radiation oncologists with different approaches and wondering how to know which one is better for me?
Alexander Lin, MD, Radiation Oncologist at Penn Medicine, responds:
It depends on the area that needs to be treated. If the area being covered is located close to normal tissues that need to be spared, then IMRT does a better job of delivering dose to areas of tumor, while sparing normal tissues as much as possible. Studies have shown that IMRT can significantly improve sparing of the salivary glands, thereby reducing the risk of long-term symptomatic dry mouth.
This question and answer was part of the OncoLink Brown Bag Chat Series. View the entire Head and Neck Cancer Q&A Webchat transcript.
OncoLink is designed for educational purposes only and is not engaged in rendering medical advice or professional services. The information provided through OncoLink should not be used for diagnosing or treating a health problem or a disease. It is not a substitute for professional care. If you have or suspect you may have a health problem or have questions or concerns about the medication that you have been prescribed, you should consult your health care provider.
Information Provided By: www.oncolink.org | © 2016 Trustees of The University of Pennsylvania