1
UI - 11236399
AU - Rockhill B
TI -
The privatization of risk.
SO - Am J Public Health 2001 Mar;91(3):365-8
AD - Channing Laboratory, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's
Hospital, Boston, Mass., USA. beverly.rockhill@channing.harvard.edu
The privatization, or individualization, of risk factor knowledge has
been largely responsible for a rising tide of criticism of epidemiology.
The current debate seems polarized into 2 sides, those who support and
those who attack "risk factor" epidemiology. This commentary aims to
reinvigorate some of Geoffrey Rose's central arguments and show that
this debate may miss a key point: a risk factor is a probabilistic
concept that applies to an aggregate of individuals, not to a specific
individual. Risk factor knowledge compels those in public health to seek
actions that shift population distributions of these factors and, to do
so, to understand their social, economic, and political determinants.
The author links Rose's qualitative distinction between the causes of
cases and the causes of incidence to an examination of the conceptual
and quantitative limits of "individual risk" estimation. The attempt to
predict individuals' futures on the basis of risk factor profile is
especially prominent now with breast cancer. The author suggests reasons
why a policy promoting private decision making about risk, while likely
ineffective from a population standpoint, is viewed as the only feasible
primary prevention option against this disease.
2
UI - 11881908
AU - Isaacs C; Peshkin BN; Schwartz M; Demarco TA; Main D; Lerman C
TI -
Breast and ovarian cancer screening practices in healthy women with a
strong family history of breast or ovarian cancer.
SO - Breast Cancer Res Treat 2002 Jan;71(2):103-12
AD - Department of Medical Oncology, Lombardi Cancer Center, Georgetown
University, Washington, DC 20007-2197, USA. isaacsc@georgetown.edu
Studies in women with a family history of cancer demonstrate a wide
variability in the uptake of cancer screening measures. Little data
exist regarding the breast and ovarian cancer screening practices of
women who are members of hereditary breast cancer families. In order to
address this issue, we examined the screening behaviors and the
determinants of screening in a clinic based group of 216 women with a
strong family history of breast or ovarian cancer who were participating
in a free genetic counseling and testing research program. At baseline,
prior to obtaining genetic counseling or testing, 50% of women ages
30-39, 83% of those age 40-49, 69% of those 50-64, and 53% of those >65
reported having a mammogram in the prior year. Adherence to mammography
recommendations was correlated with age, number of relatives with breast
cancer, and income. Twenty percent of participants had at least one CA-
125 performed and 31 % had ever obtained a screening ultrasound. Having
at least one relative with ovarian cancer was very strongly associated
with ovarian cancer screening [OR = 12.3, 95% CI = 4.6-33 for CA-125;
OR=4.9, 95% CI=2.4, 10.1 for ultrasound]. No association between cancer
worries/distress and either breast or ovarian cancer screening was
found. In conclusion, the breast and ovarian screening uptake in healthy
women from hereditary breast cancer families is suboptimal, even for
women over age 50, for whom annual mammography is clearly indicated.
These findings indicate a need for better education about screening
guidelines for high-risk women.
3
UI - 12080482
AU - Schleider SA; Schwarz-Boeger U; Jonat W; Kiechle M
TI -
[Primary and secondary breast cancer prevention. Knowledge, assessment
and participation among the female population of Schleswig-Holstein]
SO - Zentralbl Gynakol 2002 Apr;124(4):207-12
AD - Universitatsfrauenklinik der Christian-Albrechts-Universitat Kiel,
Germany.
OBJECTIVE: The intention was to find out to what extend women in
Schleswig-Holstein were informed about primary and secondary preventive
measures concerning breast cancer, how they assess their efficiency and
2000 1 520 women in Schleswig-Holsteins were asked to complete a
questionnaire about breast cancer prevention. There was a representative
opinion poll of the market research company "Institut fur
Gesundheitsforschung Munchen (Infratest)". RESULTS: Most of the women
(90.6 %) believed in the efficiency of early recognition of breast
cancer at the gynaecologist, only 79.3 % of them stated that they took
the chance of taking part in the annual examination. According to the
doctors Union "Kassenarztliche Vereinigung", only 50.4 % of the female
members of health insurance schemes took part in examinations concerning
the early recognition of breast cancer in 1999. The degree of knowledge
about and participation in preventive measures depend on the age of the
women. The gynaecologist was named as the most important source of
information and counselling. CONCLUSION: In future the population needs
more information and instruction concerning breast cancer preventive
measures.
4
UI - 12163683
AU - Grant WB
TI -
Comments on E. Giovannucci, "Insulin, insulin-like growth factors and
colon cancer: a review of the evidence".
SO - J Nutr 2002 Aug;132(8):2324; discussion 2325
5
UI - 12174401
AU - Wismer BA; Moskowitz JM; Min K; Chen AM; Ahn Y; Cho S; Jun S; Lew A; Pak
TI -
YM; Wong JM; Tager IB
Interim assessment of a community intervention to improve breast and
cervical cancer screening among Korean American women.
SO - J Public Health Manag Pract 2001 Mar;7(2):61-70
AD - Center for Family and Community Health, School of Public Health,
University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.
Breast and cervical cancer screening practices are suboptimal among
Korean American women. A community intervention program was launched in
1996 to improve breast and cervical cancer screening among Korean
American women in Alameda County, California. After 18 months, interim
program assessment revealed that mammograms improved, but Pap smears,
breast self-examinations, and clinical breast examinations did not
change significantly. However, results were similar for the control
county probably because the program was not implemented fully. Several
strategies for improving program implementation are discussed including
recommendations for researchers planning community intervention
projects.
6
UI - 1309185
AU - Fletcher SW; Fletcher RH
TI -
The breast is close to the heart.
SO - Ann Intern Med 1992 Dec 1;117(11):969-71
7
UI - 8460867
AU - Giliberti JJ
TI -
The breast cancer screening controversy continues.
SO - Ann Intern Med 1993 May 1;118(9):748; discussion 748-9
8
UI - 12079444
AU - Geller AC; Prout MN; Miller DR; Siegel B; Sun T; Ockene J; Koh HK
TI -
Evaluation of a cancer prevention and detection curriculum for medical
students.
SO - Prev Med 2002 Jul;35(1):78-86
AD - Department of Dermatology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston,
Massachusetts 02118, USA. ageller@bu.edu
BACKGROUND: Undergraduate medical education needs revision to ensure
that medical students graduate with the skills necessary to assist their
patients in cancer prevention and detection. We sought to implement and
incorporate a cancer education curriculum into the students' core
curriculum and to assess their skill levels prior to (1996), during
(1997), and at the peak (1998-1999) of the incorporation of new hours.
METHODS: We conducted pretest and posttest surveys of students at Boston
University School of Medicine (medical student years 1-4) enrolled in
each of the four study years (1996-1999). A total of 1,956 surveys
(response rate, 82%) were completed. The primary outcome measure was the
student's self-reported skill level (with responses ranging from 1 (very
unskilled) to 5 (very skilled)) for counseling for tobacco cessation,
tobacco prevention, and sun protection and for the early detection of
breast, skin, and cervical cancer. Mean scores were computed for each
chronological year of the study and medical school year. Differences and
trends over time in mean scores of students in each medical school year
were evaluated using multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: The number
of hours of cancer education increased from 6 in 1996 to 15 in 1999.
Strong improvements in self-rated skill levels were recorded for four of
the six measures. In particular, tobacco cessation counseling skill rose
from 2.16 (1996) to 3.13 (1999) for second year students (P < 0.001) and
from 3.27 (1996) to 4.17 (1999) for fourth year students (P < 0.001).
Among fourth year students, the percentage reporting that cancer
prevention was given too little emphasis declined from 62% (1996) to 26%
(1999) (P < 0.001), suggesting that the expanded curriculum reflected
the students' preferences. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer education can be
interwoven into the existing medical school curriculum and produce
improvements in students' skill levels for counseling and examinations.
Strategies to enhance prevention teaching can use this model.
9
UI - 12079445
AU - Thompson B; Thompson LA; Andersen MR; Hager S; Taylor V; Urban N
TI -
Costs and cost-effectiveness of a clinical intervention to increase
mammography utilization in an inner city public health hospital.
SO - Prev Med 2002 Jul;35(1):87-96
AD - Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue North,
MP-702, Seattle, Washington 98109-1024, USA. bthompso@fhcrc.org
BACKGROUND: Studies have demonstrated the cost-effectiveness of
screening women for breast cancer; however, the cost-effectiveness of
strategies to motivate women to receive breast cancer screening has been
less well studied. METHODS: A total of 196 women, aged 50 to 74, who
were enrolled in a public health hospital clinic, were noncompliant with
mammography screening, and had at least one routine clinic appointment
during the study period (15 months) were entered into a randomized,
controlled trial of a motivational intervention to increase mammography
rates. Costs were captured via a modified Delphi technique, accounting
records, sampling of staff time logs, and an estimation of miscellaneous
and overhead costs. Summary costs were calculated using Excel spread
sheets. RESULTS: Overall, 49% of women who received the intervention had
a mammogram within 8 weeks of an index visit compared with 22% of
control women. Calculation of the cost-effectiveness of the project
showed an additional cost of $151 (1996 U.S.$) for each woman receiving
the intervention and $559 for each additional woman motivated to receive
a mammogram. CONCLUSIONS: Cost tracking and cost-effectiveness analysis
can be done when intervening in a clinical setting, thereby allowing
clinics to make informed decisions about implementing programs to
increase motivation of their patients to receive screening.
10
UI - 12101107
AU - Jakes RW; Duffy SW; Ng FC; Gao F; Ng EH; Seow A; Lee HP; Yu MC
TI -
Mammographic parenchymal patterns and self-reported soy intake in
Singapore Chinese women.
SO - Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002 Jul;11(7):608-13
AD - National Medical Research Council Clinical Trials and Epidemiology
Research Unit, Singapore 169039.
The study aimed to investigate whether self-reported dietary variables
were associated with mammographic parenchymal patterns, which have been
shown to predict risk of breast cancer. Among the 3,421 women, ages
45-74 years, common to two independent population-based cohorts,
mammographic parenchymal patterns and current dietary habits were
assessed for 406 randomly chosen participants. Logistic regression
methods were used to compare dietary and other lifestyle profiles
between subjects classified as displaying high (cases) and low risk
(controls) parenchymal patterns. After adjustment for energy intake and
other potential confounders, dietary soy protein intake was inversely
related to risk of high-risk parenchymal pattern (odds ratio, 0.41; 95%
confidence interval, 0.18-0.94, highest versus lowest quartile of
intake). Similarly, the highest versus lowest quartile of dietary soy
isoflavone intake was significantly related to low-risk parenchymal
patterns (odds ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.98). The
association between high soy intake and a reduced risk of mammographic
parenchymal patterns that are associated with high breast cancer risk
may have important implications in breast cancer prevention.
11
UI - 12101108
AU - Harper-Wynne C; Ross G; Sacks N; Salter J; Nasiri N; Iqbal J; A'Hern R;
TI -
Dowsett M
Effects of the aromatase inhibitor letrozole on normal breast epithelial
cell proliferation and metabolic indices in postmenopausal women: a
pilot study for breast cancer prevention.
SO - Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002 Jul;11(7):614-21
AD - Academic Department of Biochemistry, Royal Marsden Hospital, London SW3
6JJ, United Kingdom.
The aromatase enzyme converts androgens to estrogens and is the
therapeutic target for aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal patients
with estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer.
Third-generation inhibitors such as letrozole are being considered as
potential prophylactic agents for breast cancer. The rationale for their
preventive application would be aided by knowledge of their effects on
the normal breast and on other estrogen-dependent processes such as bone
and lipid metabolism. Thirty-two women without active breast disease
were recruited to 3-month treatment with letrozole (2.5 mg/day).
Core-cut biopsies from the breast and blood samples were collected
before and at the end of treatment. Plasma estradiol levels were
markedly suppressed in all but two patients, who were excluded from the
efficacy assessment. There was no significant change in the
proliferation marker Ki67 (mean change, -23%; 95% confidence interval,
-50% to +23%) or estrogen receptor in breast epithelial cells with
treatment. Similarly, there were no significant changes in plasma levels
of insulin-like growth factor I or lipid profiles. However, there was a
significant increase (25%) in the levels of the bone resorption marker
C-telopeptide crosslinks (CTx). We conclude that any prophylactic effect
of letrozole is not likely to be dependent on antiproliferative effects
on normal breast. Studies in healthy patients will need to recognize the
potential for enhanced bone resorption.
12
UI - 12101118
AU - Mokbel K; Singh-Ranger G; Kirkpatrick K
TI -
Correspondence re: Cotterchio et al., Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory
drug use and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev., 10:
1213-1217, 2001.
SO - Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002 Jul;11(7):674; discussion 674
13
UI - 12149305
AU - Rock CL; Demark-Wahnefried W
TI -
Nutrition and survival after the diagnosis of breast cancer: a review of
the evidence.
SO - J Clin Oncol 2002 Aug 1;20(15):3302-16
AD - Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Cancer Prevention and
Control Program, Dept. 901, University of California-San Diego, 9500
Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0901, USA. clrock@ucsd.edu
PURPOSE: To review and summarize evidence from clinical and
epidemiologic studies that have examined the relationship between
nutritional factors, survival, and recurrence after the diagnosis of
breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Relevant clinical and
epidemiologic studies were identified through a MEDLINE search.
References of identified reports also were used to identify additional
published articles for critical review. RESULTS: Several nutritional
factors modify the progression of disease and prognosis after the
diagnosis of breast cancer. Overweight or obesity is associated with
poorer prognosis in the majority of the studies that have examined this
relationship. Treatment-related weight gain also may influence
disease-free survival, reduce quality of life, and increase risk for
comorbid conditions. Five of 12 studies that examined the relationship
between dietary fat and survival found an inverse association, which was
not evident on energy adjustment in most of these studies. The majority
of the studies that examined intakes of vegetables or nutrients provided
by vegetables and fruit found an inverse relationship with survival.
Alcohol intake was not associated with survival in the majority of the
studies that examined this relationship. CONCLUSION: Much remains to be
learned about the role of nutritional factors in survival after the
diagnosis of breast cancer. Healthy weight control with an emphasis on
exercise to preserve or increase lean muscle mass and a diet that
includes nutrient-rich vegetables can be recommended. Diets that have
adequate vegetables, fruit, whole grains, and low-fat dairy foods and
that are low in saturated fat may help to lower overall disease risk in
this population.
14
UI - 12149307
AU - Chlebowski RT; Col N; Winer EP; Collyar DE; Cummings SR; Vogel VG 3rd;
TI -
Burstein HJ; Eisen A; Lipkus I; Pfister DG; American Society of Clinical
Oncology Breast Cancer Technology Assessment Working Group
American Society of Clinical Oncology technology assessment of
pharmacologic interventions for breast cancer risk reduction including
tamoxifen, raloxifene, and aromatase inhibition.
SO - J Clin Oncol 2002 Aug 1;20(15):3328-43
AD - Health Services Research Department, American Society of Clinical
Oncology, 1900 Duke Street, Suite 200, Alexandria, VA 22314, USA.
guidelines@asco.org
OBJECTIVE: To update an evidence-based technology assessment of
chemoprevention strategies for breast cancer risk reduction. POTENTIAL
INTERVENTIONS: Tamoxifen, raloxifene, aromatase inhibition, and
fenretinide. OUTCOMES: Outcomes of interest include breast cancer
incidence, breast cancer-specific survival, overall survival, and net
health benefit. EVIDENCE: A comprehensive, formal literature review was
conducted for relevant topics. Testimony was collected from invited
experts and interested parties. The American Society of Clinical
Oncology (ASCO) prescribed technology assessment procedure was followed.
VALUES: More weight was given to published randomized trials.
BENEFITS/HARMS: A woman's decision regarding breast cancer risk
reduction strategies is complex and will depend on the importance and
weight attributed to information regarding both cancer- and
noncancer-related risks and benefits. CONCLUSIONS: For women with a
defined 5-year projected breast cancer risk of > or= 1.66%, tamoxifen
(at 20 mg/d for 5 years) may be offered to reduce their risk.
Risk/benefit models suggest that greatest clinical benefit with least
side effects is derived from use of tamoxifen in younger (premenopausal)
women (who are less likely to have thromboembolic sequelae and uterine
cancer), women without a uterus, and women at higher breast cancer risk.
Data do not as yet suggest that tamoxifen provides an overall health
benefit or increases survival. In all circumstances, tamoxifen use
should be discussed as part of an informed decision-making process with
careful consideration of individually calculated risks and benefits. Use
of tamoxifen combined with hormone replacement therapy or use of
raloxifene, any aromatase inhibitor or inactivator, or fenretinide to
lower the risk of developing breast cancer is not recommended outside of
a clinical trial setting. This technology assessment represents an
ongoing process and recommendations will be updated in a timely matter.
VALIDATION: The conclusions were endorsed by the ASCO Health Services
Research Committee and the ASCO Board of Directors.
15
UI - 8379981
AU - Ross JM; Gerber P
TI -
The breast cancer screening controversy continues.
SO - Ann Intern Med 1993 May 1;118(9):747; discussion 748-9
16
UI - 12208797
AU - Decensi A; Omodei U; Robertson C; Bonanni B; Guerrieri-Gonzaga A;
TI -
Ramazzotto F; Johansson H; Mora S; Sandri MT; Cazzaniga M; Franchi M;
Pecorelli S
Effect of transdermal estradiol and oral conjugated estrogen on
C-reactive protein in retinoid-placebo trial in healthy women.
SO - Circulation 2002 Sep 3;106(10):1224-8
AD - Division of Chemoprevention, European Institute of Oncology, Milan,
Italy. andrea.decensi@ieo.it
BACKGROUND: The increase in C-reactive protein (CRP) during oral
conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) may explain the initial excess of
cardiovascular disease observed in clinical studies. Because the effect
of transdermal estradiol (E2) on CRP is unclear, we compared CRP changes
after 6 and 12 months of transdermal E2 and oral CEE in a randomized 2x2
retinoid-placebo trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 189
postmenopausal women were randomized to 50 microg/d transdermal E2 and
100 mg BID of the retinoid fenretinide (n=45), 50 microg/d transdermal
E2 and placebo (n=49), 0.625 mg/d oral CEE and 100 mg BID fenretinide
(n=46), or 0.625 mg/d oral CEE and placebo (n=49) for 1 year. Sequential
medroxyprogesterone acetate was added in each group. Relative to
baseline, CRP increased by 10% (95% CI -9% to 33%) and by 48% (95% CI
22% to 78%) after 6 months of transdermal E2 and oral CEE, respectively.
The corresponding figures at 12 months were 3% (95% CI -14% to 23%) for
transdermal E2 and 64% (95% CI 38% to 96%) for oral CEE. Fenretinide did
not change CRP levels at 6 and 12 months relative to placebo. Relative
to oral CEE, the mean change in CRP after 12 months of transdermal E2
was -48% (95% CI -85% to -7%, P=0.012), whereas fenretinide was
associated with a mean change of -1% (95% CI -34% to 40%, P=0.79)
compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to oral CEE, transdermal
E2 does not elevate CRP levels up to 12 months of treatment. The
implications for early risk of coronary heart disease require further
studies.
17
UI - 7850547
AU - Gardner B
TI -
Prophylactic mastectomy: an unnecessary procedure.
SO - Ann Surg Oncol 1994 Nov;1(6):453-4
18
UI - 7850550
AU - Kroll SS; Miller MJ; Schusterman MA; Reece GP; Singletary SE; Ames F
TI -
Rationale for elective contralateral mastectomy with immediate bilateral
reconstruction.
SO - Ann Surg Oncol 1994 Nov;1(6):457-61
AD - Department of Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery, University of Texas
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston 77030.
BACKGROUND: Women with breast cancer treated by mastectomy with
immediate breast reconstruction can get exceptionally good results if
the reconstruction is performed with autogenous tissue using the
transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap. Bilateral
reconstruction with TRAM flaps is also possible, but only if both
breasts are reconstructed at the same time. To avoid the possibility of
subsequently developing contralateral malignancy and having to undergo
assymetrical reconstruction with a different technique, some patients
have chosen the alternative of bilateral mastectomy with bilateral
immediate reconstruction. This is only reasonable if the incidence of
failure in bilateral breast reconstruction is very low. METHODS: We
prospectively studied reconstructive outcomes in 100 patients who had
breast cancer and who underwent bilateral mastectomy and reconstruction
(using implants as well as TRAM flaps). We also reviewed the histologic
findings in 88 prophylactically removed high-risk breasts. RESULTS:
Successful outcomes were initially achieved in 95 patients; of the 5
failures, two were successfully reconstructed with alternative
techniques for an overall success rate of 97%. Of the 63 patients
reconstructed with bilateral TRAM flaps, all but one (98%) were
successful on the first try. TRAM flap reconstructions were
significantly more likely to be successful than were those based on
implants (p = 0.05). Previously unsuspected invasive cancer was found in
3 patients (3.4%), whereas carcinoma in situ was found in 5 patients
(5.7%) and in another 18 patients (20%) cellular atypia was present.
CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral breast reconstruction has a low incidence of
failure, particularly if TRAM flaps are used. For selected patients,
elective contralateral mastectomy with immediate bilateral
reconstruction is a reasonable treatment alternative provided that the
necessary expertise is available and the patients clearly understand the
risks.
19
UI - 11509412
AU - Davis SR
TI -
Phytoestrogen therapy for menopausal symptoms?
SO - BMJ 2001 Aug 18;323(7309):354-5
20
UI - 11535704
AU - Stefanek M; Hartmann L; Nelson W
TI -
Risk-reduction mastectomy: clinical issues and research needs.
SO - J Natl Cancer Inst 2001 Sep 5;93(17):1297-306
AD - Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population
Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. ms496r@nih.gov
Risk-reduction mastectomy (RRM), also known as bilateral prophylactic
mastectomy, is a controversial clinical option for women who are at
increased risk of breast cancer. High-risk women, including women with a
strong family history of breast cancer and BRCA1/2 mutation carriers,
have several clinical options: risk-reduction surgery (bilateral
mastectomy and bilateral oophorectomy), surveillance (mammography,
clinical breast examination, and breast self-examination), and
chemoprevention (tamoxifen). We review research in a number of areas
central to our understanding of RRM, including recent data on 1) the
effectiveness of RRM in reducing breast cancer risk, 2) the perception
of RRM among women at increased risk and health-care providers, 3) the
decision-making process for follow-up care of women at high risk, and 4)
satisfaction and psychological status after surgery. We suggest areas of
future research to better guide high-risk women and their health-care
providers in the decision-making process.
21
UI - 11720840
AU - Ernst MF; Voogd AC; Coebergh JW; Repelaer van Driel OJ; Roukema JA
TI -
The introduction of mammographical screening has had little effect on
the trend in breast-conserving surgery: a population-based study in
Southeast Netherlands.
SO - Eur J Cancer 2001 Dec;37(18):2435-40
AD - Department of Surgery, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
In addition to reducing breast cancer mortality, breast cancer screening
programmes are expected to increase the proportion of patients who can
undergo breast-conserving surgery. Trends in the use of
breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in Southeast Netherlands between 1990
and 1998 were studied in relation to the gradual introduction of
mammographical screening for women 50-69 years of age between 1992 and
1996. The characteristics of the tumours detected by the screening
programme or outside of the programme were compared, to see whether this
might clarify the observed trends. In the period 1990-1998, 4788
patients were diagnosed with invasive, operable breast cancer, of whom
2341 were 50-69 years of age. Although the screening programme resulted
in a larger proportion of patients with small tumours and more
favourable tumour characteristics, no increase was observed in the use
of BCS for patients 50-69 years of age in the period 1990-1998 (64% in
1990 and 1998). Patients with a screening-detected tumour, however, were
more likely to undergo breast conservation compared with those
presenting clinically (68% versus 54%; P<0.0001). In conclusion, no
increase in the proportion of breast-conserving surgical procedures was
observed in Southeast Netherlands among patients 50-69 years of age in
the period 1990-1998, during the introduction of mass mammographical
screening for this group. Screening, however, resulted in a larger
proportion of patients with small tumours with more favourable
characteristics, who are better candidates for breast conservation.
22
UI - 11876389
AU - Aubard Y; Genet D; Eyraud JL; Clavere P; Tubiana-Mathieu N; Philippe HJ
TI -
Impact of screening on breast cancer detection. Retrospective
comparative study of two periods ten years apart.
SO - Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2002;23(1):37-41
AD - Service de gynecologie-obstetrique, CHU Dupuytren, Limoges, France.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in the mode of
discovery of breast cancer in the last 15 years. We compared two periods
separated by a 10-year interval, during which a mass mammographic
screening programme was established in our department. MATERIALS AND
METHOD: We made a retrospective comparison of the records of female
patients with breast cancer diagnosed in our hospital over the period
1986-1989 (first period) and 1997-1999 (second period). The mass
screening programme for breast cancer began in 1995. RESULTS: We
collected 372 patients in the first period and 341 in the second. We
found a significant change in the mode of the discovery of breast cancer
between the two periods: 80.2% versus 51.9%, respectively, of the cases
of breast cancer were discovered by breast self-examination, 10.2%
versus 13.7% were discovered by a physician, and 4.8% versus 29.1% were
discovered by routine mammography as part of an individual or mass
screening programme. The mean size of the tumours decreased
significantly (2.6 cm versus 2.3 cm: p = 0.019), and the number of
tumours with initial metastases or lymph node involvement decreased,
almost attaining the level of significance (p = 0.06). It is difficult
to compare the survival and disease-free survival curves because of the
short follow-up in the second period (median follow-up = 10 months).
However, a marked difference appears to be developing (p < 0.0001):
patients diagnosed by mammography are showing better survival and
disease-free survival compared with the others. DISCUSSION: We observed
that more widespread use of mammography screening for breast cancer led
to smaller tumours being discovered during the second period, with less
lymph node involvement and less initial metastasis. Breast cancer
screening is one of the most intensively evaluated health care practices
with eight completed randomized trials yet its net benefit has remained
controversial. It has been shown that, at least for patients aged 50 to
70, properly organized mass screening for breast cancer led to a
reduction in mortality rate. However, individual breast self-exam,
physician and mammographic screening can interfere with assessment of
mass screening programmes in terms of individual benefit. In addition,
introducing a mass screening programme may induce opportunistic
screening in non-invited age groups and influence health behaviour in
the target and non target populations. A retrospective study was
performed to evaluate the mode of discovery, the diagnostic
presentation, and prognostic factors in breast cancer in a French
department before and after initiation of a mass-screening programme
(MSP).
23
UI - 11876392
AU - Benedet JL; Cabero-Roura L
TI -
Strategies for the modification of risk factors in gynecological
cancers.
SO - Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2002;23(1):5-10
AD - Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of British Columbia,
BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada.
Strategies to modify risk for female or gynecological cancers will vary
with our knowledge of the epidemiology, etiology, and specific molecular
mechanisms for each individual cancer. In general, cancer preventive
strategies have been divided into primary and secondary prevention with
primary prevention directed toward the causative factors for a disease.
Secondary prevention is classically used in cervical cancer cytology
screening programs and is essentially an attempt to identify individuals
in a population with preclinical phases of the disease where
intervention will impact mortality the most. A vast literature has
evolved regarding the epidemiology of most of the common cancers in
women. While the specific molecular mechanisms are not completely
understood at this time knowledge of contributing factors for many of
these tumors is well known. The association of cigarette smoking with
lung cancer has been well established and the increasing rates of lung
cancer, particularly in women, are directly linked to the increasing
number of female smokers in the population. Indeed in many western
countries lung cancer deaths have overtaken breast cancer as the most
common cause of death from malignant disease in women. Excessive sun
exposure without adequate skin protection is another lifestyle activity
that is related to the high incidence of skin cancer in certain areas.
Epidemiologically, cervical cancer has been studied extensively with the
current data indicating a causal role of exposure to human
papillomavirus (HPV), particularly at an early age in this disease.
Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndromes are well understood and
as more information on human genomics becomes available a clear
understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms of these diseases
will be possible and hopefully will result in effective strategies for
their control. Unfortunately, in spite of the vast knowledge that is
available regarding risk factors for many of these malignancies we have
been unable to influence effective lifestyle changes that could
substantially reduce the risk of these malignancies in our population.
Increased efforts in education, research, and commitment--both financial
and educational--are required by governments and other social
organizations.
24
UI - 12082868
AU - Garne JP; Hessov I
TI -
[WHO and The Lancet: yes to mammographic screening]
SO - Ugeskr Laeger 2002 Jun 3;164(23):3081-2; discussion 3082-3
25
UI - 12093247
AU - Mulley AG; Sepucha K
TI -
Making good decisions about breast cancer chemoprevention.
SO - Ann Intern Med 2002 Jul 2;137(1):52-4
26
UI - 12093267
AU - Anonymous
TI -
Summaries for patients. Using medication to prevent breast cancer:
recommendations from the United States Preventive Services Task Force.
SO - Ann Intern Med 2002 Jul 2;137(1):I62
27
UI - 12177796
AU - Vatten LJ; Romundstad PR; Trichopoulos D; Skjaerven R
TI -
Pregnancy related protection against breast cancer depends on length of
gestation.
SO - Br J Cancer 2002 Jul 29;87(3):289-90
AD - Department of Community Medicine and General Practice, The Norwegian
University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Lars.Vatten@medisin.ntnu.no
In a prospective study of 694 657 parous women in Norway, 5474 developed
breast cancer after their first birth. If the first pregnancy lasted
less than 32 weeks, the risk was 22% (95% confidence interval, -3% to
53%) less than after a pregnancy of 40 weeks or more, with a significant
declining trend in risk (P for trend=0.02). Copyright 2002 Cancer
Research UK
28
UI - 12197698
AU - Wooltorton E
TI -
Tamoxifen for breast cancer prevention: safety warning.
SO - CMAJ 2002 Aug 20;167(4):378-9
29
UI - 12204013
AU - Miller AB; To T; Baines CJ; Wall C
TI -
The Canadian National Breast Screening Study-1: breast cancer mortality
after 11 to 16 years of follow-up. A randomized screening trial of
mammography in women age 40 to 49 years.
SO - Ann Intern Med 2002 Sep 3;137(5 Part 1):305-12
AD - University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. a.miller@dkfz-heidelberg.de
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of breast cancer screening in women age 40 to
49 years remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To compare breast cancer
mortality in 40- to 49-year-old women who received either 1) screening
with annual mammography, breast physical examination, and instruction on
breast self-examination on 4 or 5 occasions or 2) community care after a
single breast physical examination and instruction on breast
self-examination. DESIGN: Individually randomized, controlled trial.
SETTING: 15 Canadian centers. PARTICIPANTS: 50 430 volunteers age 40 to
pregnant, had no previous breast cancer diagnosis, and had not had
mammography in the preceding 12 months. INTERVENTIONS: Breast physical
examination and instruction on breast self-examination preceded random
assignment of 25 214 women to receive mammography and annual
mammography, breast physical examination, and breast self-examination
and 25 216 women to receive usual community care with annual follow-up.
MEASUREMENTS: Verified breast cancer incidence and cohort mortality
1996. RESULTS: The 105 breast cancer deaths in the mammography group and
108 breast cancer deaths in the usual care group yielded a cumulative
rate ratio, adjusted for mammography done outside the study, of 1.06
(95% CI, 0.80 to 1.40). A total of 592 cases of invasive breast cancer
in the mammography group compared with 552 and 29 cases, respectively,
in the usual care group. The expected proportions of nonpalpable and
small invasive tumors were detected on mammography. CONCLUSION: After 11
to 16 years of follow-up, four or five annual screenings with
mammography, breast physical examination, and breast self-examination
had not reduced breast cancer mortality compared with usual community
care after a single breast physical examination and instruction on
breast self-examination. The study data show that true effects of 20% or
greater are unlikely.
30
UI - 12204019
AU - U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
TI -
Screening for breast cancer: recommendations and rationale.
SO - Ann Intern Med 2002 Sep 3;137(5 Part 1):344-6
31
UI - 12204020
AU - Humphrey LL; Helfand M; Chan BK; Woolf SH
TI -
Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S.
Preventive Services Task Force.
SO - Ann Intern Med 2002 Sep 3;137(5 Part 1):347-60
AD - Oregon Health & Science University and Portland Veterans Affairs Medical
Center, Mailcode BICC, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR
97201-3098, USA.
PURPOSE: To synthesize new data on breast cancer screening for the U.S.
Preventive Services Task Force. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE; the Cochrane
Controlled Trials Registry; and reference lists of reviews, editorials,
and original studies. STUDY SELECTION: Eight randomized, controlled
trials of mammography and 2 trials evaluating breast self-examination
were included. One hundred fifty-four publications of the results of
these trials, as well as selected articles about the test
characteristics and harms associated with screening, were examined. DATA
EXTRACTION: Predefined criteria were used to assess the quality of each
study. Meta-analyses using a Bayesian random-effects model were
conducted to provide summary relative risk estimates and credible
intervals (CrIs) for the effectiveness of screening with mammography in
reducing death from breast cancer. DATA SYNTHESIS: For studies of fair
quality or better, the summary relative risk was 0.84 (95% CrI, 0.77 to
0.91) and the number needed to screen to prevent one death from breast
cancer after approximately 14 years of observation was 1224 (CrI, 665 to
2564). Among women younger than 50 years of age, the summary relative
risk associated with mammography was 0.85 (CrI, 0.73 to 0.99) and the
number needed to screen to prevent one death from breast cancer after 14
years of observation was 1792 (CrI, 764 to 10 540). For clinical breast
examination and breast self-examination, evidence from randomized trials
is inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: In the randomized, controlled trials,
mammography reduced breast cancer mortality rates among women 40 to 74
years of age. Greater absolute risk reduction was seen among older
women. Because these results incorporate several rounds of screening,
the actual number of mammograms needed to prevent one death from breast
cancer is higher. In addition, each screening has associated risks and
costs.
32
UI - 12204022
AU - Sox H
TI -
Screening mammography for younger women: back to basics.
SO - Ann Intern Med 2002 Sep 3;137(5 Part 1):361-2
33
UI - 12204023
AU - Goodman SN
TI -
The mammography dilemma: a crisis for evidence-based medicine?
SO - Ann Intern Med 2002 Sep 3;137(5 Part 1):363-5
34
UI - 12204045
AU - Anonymous
TI -
Summaries for patients. Mammograms in women age 40 to 49: results of the
Canadian Breast Cancer Screening study.
SO - Ann Intern Med 2002 Sep 3;137(5 Part 1):I28
35
UI - 12204048
AU - Anonymous
TI -
Summaries for patients. Screening for breast cancer: recommendations
from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
SO - Ann Intern Med 2002 Sep 3;137(5 Part 1):I47
36
UI - 11997678
AU - Benshushan A; Brzezinski A
TI -
Hormonal manipulations and breast cancer.
SO - Obstet Gynecol Surv 2002 May;57(5):314-23
AD - Lecturer in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Obstetrics and
Gynecology, The Hebrew University, Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem,
Israel. benshushan@netscape.net
Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women and the leading
cause of death in women, 40 to 55 years of age. The lifetime odds of
developing breast cancer are apparently up to 1 in 8 women in North
America and 1 in 12 in Western Europe. According to the American Cancer
Society, some 200,000 women (and 1,500 men) will be diagnosed with
breast cancer this year. Although the incidence of breast cancer in
women has been rising since the mid-1940s, the mortality has dropped
modestly over the past decade, probably due to earlier and improved
diagnosis and treatment.Evidence from both epidemiological and
experimental studies points to an important role of reproductive
variables in the development and promotion of human breast neoplasia.
Hormonal manipulations, in the form of contraceptives, hormone
replacement therapy, or antiestrogens, affect the incidence and course
of breast cancer and may be useful in prevention and treatment of the
tumor. In this review we summarize the current status of the use of
hormones and antihormones in regard to breast cancer and outline
possible areas of additional development and investigation. TARGET
AUDIENCE: Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Family Physicians. LEARNING
OBJECTIVES: After completion of this article, the reader will be able to
summarize the effects of estrogen and progestogens on the breast and to
list the effects of other hormonal modulators on the breast.
37
UI - 12192832
AU - Kole LA
TI -
Mammography and evidence-based decision making.
SO - JAAPA 2002 Jul;15(7):7-8, 13
38
UI - 2513031
AU - Roberts MM
TI -
Breast screening: time for a rethink?
SO - BMJ 1989 Nov 4;299(6708):1153-5