Susie Stonehouse-Lee, RN, MSN, CRNP & Carolyn Vachani, RN, MSN, AOCN
Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania
Last Modified: September 16, 2007
GVHD is a process in which donor T-cells "attack" the host cells, manifesting primarily in skin, liver and gastrointestinal complications. It is a frequent complication of allogeneic hematopoetic cell transplant (HCT), stem cell or bone marrow, though it has been reported rarely in syngeneic (from a twin donor) and autologous HCT. In addition, GVHD can be a rare complication of blood transfusion (irradiation of product prevents GVHD) or solid organ transplant.
GVHD is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in allogeneic HCT; with a 30-50% incidence in HLA matched sibling donor transplants and 65-70% incidence with unrelated donors. GVHD has traditionally been defined as:
Recently, it is recognized that the timing of onset is insufficient to distinguish acute from chronic GVHD, and more attention is paid to clinical manifestations rather than temporal onset of symptoms. In addition, the use of reduced intensity and T cell depleted transplants has blurred this 100 day mark distinguishing acute from chronic, which we will discuss further.
Traditionally allogeneic transplant recipients always received myeloablative regimens. Now, almost half of all allogeneic transplants are of the "reduced intensity" variety, also known as "mini" transplants, which use less intense preparative regimens. These are based on the knowledge that much of the curative potential of allogeneic transplant is not due to the preparative regimen, but is a result of the graft versus tumor affect. This is the ability of the donor's T cells to attack and destroy stray tumor cells. Mini transplants have lower toxicity, therefore expanding patient eligibility, including older patients and those with co-morbidities.
Peripherally collected stem cells (PSC) are used in many cases instead of harvested bone marrow as the product for allogeneic transplant. This results in fewer complications for donors, but may increase the risk of chronic GVHD. The choice of PSC vs bone marrow as the graft source may depend on the underlying disease state and the donor. HLA matched or mismatched cord blood used for transplant appears to result in lower rates of GVHD but in adults is limited by slower rates of engraftment and delayed immunologic recovery.
Acute GVHD is likely initiated during the preparative regimen and occurs over several steps: (see figure below)
The pathophysiology of chronic GVHD is not well understood.
Diagram of "cytokine storm" leading to acute GVHD:

Several factors increase the risk of developing acute or chronic GVHD. These may be factors inherent to the patient or donor, or factors associated with the transplant protocol or product.
Donor/recipient factors
Protocol factors
The onset of acute GVHD develops with conventional allogeneic transplant between 14-35 days after infusion (median 21-25 days), but typically can occur up to 100 days or longer. Reduced intensity transplant recipients can develop acute GVHD weeks to months after the transplant. T cell depleted grafts may also develop acute GVHD later. Donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) may be given to stimulate a graft versus tumor effect after a relapse and this can stimulate acute GVHD as well.
Hyperacute GVHD typically occurs 1 week after transplant and can be rapidly fatal, but is rare with appropriate prophylaxis. It is manifested by high persistent fevers, diffuse erythroderm, and other organ toxicity and is more common with mismatched donors. Because of the various time frames for acute GVHD, some have proposed that the persistence, recurrence, or new onset of acute GVHD signs and symptoms should be labeled acute GVHD, regardless of the time after transplantation.
Characteristics of acute GVHD (See grading table below)
Acute GVHD is graded using one of two scales. The Glucksberg scale was developed over 30 years ago and is still used in many institutions. In recent years, there has been a push to use the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry (IBMTR) interpretation of this scale, which appears to better correlate with outcomes.
Skin
Liver
Gut
Other Organs
|
Level of Organ Injury |
Skin |
Liver Bilirubin (mg/dl) |
Intestinal Tract (ml diarrhea/ day) |
|
1 |
Maculopapular rash <25% of body surface |
2-3 mg/dl |
>500 ml |
|
2 |
Maculopapular rash 25-50% of body |
3-6 mg/dl |
>1000 ml |
|
3 |
Generalized erythroderma |
6-15 mg/dl |
>1500 ml |
|
4 |
Generalized erythroderma with bullous formation and desquamation |
>15 mg/dl |
Severe abdominal pain with or without ileus |
|
Clinical Grading |
|||
|
Glucksberg Scale |
Skin |
Liver |
Intestine |
|
I |
Level 1-2 |
none |
none |
|
II |
Level 1-3 |
Level 1 |
Level 1 |
|
III |
Level 2-3 |
Level 2-3 |
Level 2-3 |
|
IV |
Level 2-4 |
Level 2-4 |
Level 2-4 |
|
IBMTR Severity Index |
Skin |
Liver |
Intestine |
|
A |
Level 1 |
0 (<2) |
0 (<500 cc) |
|
B |
Level 2 |
Level 1-2 |
Level 1-2 |
|
C |
Level 3 |
Level 3 |
Level 3 |
|
D |
Level 4 |
Level 4 |
Level 4 |
Chronic GVHD typically occurs 60-400 days after transplant and can last from months to years after. The median time to develop chronic GVHD with an unrelated donor is 133 days and 201 days for an HLA matched sibling donor. But, the timing is not particularly important to the diagnosis, rather the presence of chronic GVHD characteristics is imperative for diagnosis. Chronic GVHD can coexist with; occur after, or in the absence of acute GVHD, further complicating the diagnosis. In addition, the pathophysiology of chronic GVHD is not well understood.
Characteristics (See grading scale below)
Chronic GVHD resembles autoimmune disorders, such as lupus, Sjogren's syndrome and scleroderma. The skin, oral mucosa, liver and lacrimal glands are the most frequently involved areas. Areas less frequently involved include: cardiac, CNS, GI tract and lungs.
Skin
Eyes
Oral
Liver
Other Sites
|
Chronic GVHD grading criteria |
|
|
Limited |
Localized skin involvement and/or evidence of hepatic dysfunction. |
|
Extensive |
Either generalized skin involvement, or localized skin involvement or hepatic dysfunction plus at least one of the following:
|
Skin
Liver
Gut
Abeloff, M., Armitage, J., Niederhuber, J., Kastan, M. & McKenna, G. (Eds.): Clinical Oncology (2004). Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA.
Bacigalupo, A. (2007). "Management of acute graft-versus-host disease." Br J Haematol 137 (2): 87-98.
Baird, K. and S. Z. Pavletic (2006). "Chronic graft versus host disease." Curr Opin Hematol 13 (6): 426-35.
Bolanos-Meade, J. (2006). "Update on the management of acute graft-versus-host disease." Curr Opin Oncol 18 (2): 120-5.
Chao, N. J. and B. J. Chen (2006). "Prophylaxis and treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease." Semin Hematol 43 (1): 32-41.
Deeg, H. J. and J. H. Antin (2006). "The clinical spectrum of acute graft-versus-host disease." Semin Hematol 43 (1): 24-31.
Ferrara, J. L. and P. Reddy (2006). "Pathophysiology of graft-versus-host disease." Semin Hematol 43 (1): 3-10.
Gilman, A. L. and J. Serody (2006). "Diagnosis and treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease." Semin Hematol 43 (1): 70-80.
Hill, G. R., K. R. Cooke, et al. (1998). "Interleukin-11 promotes T cell polarization and prevents acute graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation." J Clin Invest 102 (1): 115-23.
Loren, A. W., G. R. Bunin, et al. (2006). "Impact of donor and recipient sex and parity on outcomes of HLA-identical sibling allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation." Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 12 (7): 758-69.
Porter, D. and J. E. Levine (2006). "Graft-versus-host disease and graft-versus-leukemia after donor leukocyte infusion." Semin Hematol 43 (1): 53-61.
Schaffer, J. V. (2006). "The changing face of graft-versus-host disease." Semin Cutan Med Surg 25 (4): 190-200.
Subramaniam, D. S., D. H. Fowler, et al. (2007). "Chronic graft-versus-host disease in the era of reduced-intensity conditioning." Leukemia 21 (5): 853-9.
Woltz, P., K. Castro, et al. (2006). "Care for patients undergoing extracorporeal photopheresis to treat chronic graft-versus-host disease: review of the evidence." Clin J Oncol Nurs 10 (6): 795-802.